ANALISIS RISIKO PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN SITUS MUARO JAMBI RISK ANALYSIS OF THE MUARO JAMBI HISTORICAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Muhaswad Dwiyanto; Yudi Nur Supriadi

doi:10.53363/buss.v5i2.433

Authors

Muhaswad Dwiyanto Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Yudi Nur Supriadi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/buss.v5i2.433

Keywords:

Muaro Jambi Project, risk identification, risk register

Abstract

The Muaro Jambi site, which is recognized as a Cultural Heritage through the Decree of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 259/M/2013, has an important value as the nation's cultural heritage. As part of preservation efforts, the site has a vital role in understanding and developing history, science, and culture. Therefore, its management needs to be carried out appropriately through protection, development, and utilization that can support the progress of national culture for the welfare of the community. As part of this utilization step, the Muaro Jambi Site development project will begin in 2024. To ensure that this project is carried out efficiently, effectively, and accountably, a risk analysis of various activities related to this project is carried out. The results of risk identification in the early stages of the project revealed that there were 62 risks related to museum construction, 52 risks to environmental arrangement, 63 risks to restoration, and 53 risks related to interior activities and Information Communication and Technology (ICT). These risks include operational, financial, legal, fraud, as well as strategic and policy risks. From the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the identification of risks in all project activities shows significant similarities, although there are slight differences due to the specific nature of each activity. In addition, there are several key risks that need to be seriously considered to ensure the achievement of project objectives, namely budget blocks, cultural heritage findings during excavation, and lack of involvement of the surrounding community in the sustainability of the project. Therefore, high and very high levels of risks must be addressed immediately with appropriate mitigation, while medium-level risks can be monitored on an ongoing basis. Risks with low levels still need to be monitored to prevent greater negative impacts

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Widiatmokko. (2009). Sejarah Sriwijaya dan Majapahit: Kontribusi dan Peran dalam Peradaban Asia Tenggara. Jakarta: Pustaka Muda.

Ahmed, S., McMillan, T., & Chambers, P. (2021). The role of risk management in cultural heritage projects: A review of current practices. Heritage Science, 9(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00556-2

Barton, L. (2020). Cultural heritage management: Issues and strategies. International Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(3), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733322.2020.1815411

Crawford, D. (2021). Managing risks in the preservation of cultural heritage sites. Heritage Risk Management Journal, 10(4), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrma.2021.10.001

Crawford, L. (2021). Risk management and governance in the preservation of cultural sites. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 22(3), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.01.004

Gutiérrez, R., & Lopez, M. (2021). Social and economic impacts of cultural heritage loss: A case study of Southeast Asia. Journal of Cultural Economics, 30(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-021-09312-3

Gutiérrez, R., & Lopez, M. (2021). The impact of social and economic factors in cultural heritage projects. Journal of Cultural Economics, 33(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-020-09310-5

Harris, A., & Patel, R. (2022). Integrated approaches to risk management in cultural heritage projects. Journal of Heritage Management, 14(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHM-09-2021-0185

Harris, A., & Patel, R. (2022). Strategies for mitigating risk in heritage conservation projects. Journal of Heritage Management, 15(4), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHM-11-2021-0203

Lee, J. (2022). Heritage and sustainability: A study on risk management for cultural sites. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 28(6), 711-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2030874

Mansur, A., & Durri, S. (2022). Cultural heritage as a reflection of social values and knowledge systems. Journal of Cultural Heritage Studies, 8(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.02.002

Patrich, J., & McHugh, S. (2019). Managing operational risks in cultural heritage projects. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 603-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.03.003

Patrich, J., & McHugh, S. (2019). The role of technology in mitigating risks to cultural heritage. Heritage Science, 7(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-019-0341-5

Pérez, G., & Martínez, C. (2023). Financial and administrative challenges in managing risks in heritage projects. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 28(2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2097751

Pérez, G., & Martínez, C. (2023). Risk assessment and mitigation in cultural heritage preservation. Cultural Heritage Review, 12(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.2108762

UNESCO. (2021). Cultural heritage and the impact of climate change: A global review. UNESCO Publications.

Wells, B., & Wright, S. (2020). Community engagement in cultural heritage conservation: Managing risks and benefits. Journal of Heritage and Society, 10(2), 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14745322.2020.1800159

Wells, B., & Wright, S. (2020). Community engagement in cultural heritage conservation: Managing risks and benefits. Journal of Heritage and Society, 10(3), 178-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14745322.2020.1812411